TODAY'S TOPIC:
Illegal Immigration as a Social Problem, Part II
Part I
by Natalia J. Garland
Print Version
|
Cardinal Roger M. Mahony, the Archbishop of Los Angeles, gave a
speech at the Fifth Annual John M. Templeton, Jr. Lecture on the
Constitution and Economic Liberty, in Philadelphia, on May 8,
2007. Mahony's assertions, in my opinion, are so convoluted that
it is mind-boggling to try to analyze his speech. As per my
reading of Mahony's theme and supporting arguments: his Bible
quotations are incorrectly applied to America's treatment of
illegal immigrants, his conclusion about America's immigration
laws is false, and his view of illegal immigrants seems both vague
and romantic.
Below are passages
from Mahony's speech which I have selected for commentary. Each
passage is printed in boldface to show that it is a direct
quotation. I have also indicated the paragraph number from which
each passage is taken.
COMMENTARY ON
CARDINAL MAHONY'S SPEECH
(1) My
perspective on the economy, however, is not the common sense
understanding of this term. "Economy" has its roots in
the Greek oikonomia which, in the first instance, means the
arrangement of a household. Here, the principal focus is not
monetary. Oikonomia suggests care for how a household is
ordered or administered according to a plan. (From paragraph
#3)
It is difficult to
argue against Scripture or biblical themes, because Scripture can
be misquoted to justify almost anything. Mahony's first theme is
that of oikonomia. He seems to view the economy as
involving both money and a general sense of order or management,
although he clearly states that his focus is not on money. And,
it would seem that Mahony's focus on the administration of a
household refers to making changes in current immigration law and
providing a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants. For
Mahony, these are the three characteristics of oikonomia in
America's immigration situation: (A) Money, (B) Changing
immigration laws, (C) Pathway to citizenship.
For illegal
immigrants, however, it is probably money, or jobs, which is
their main focus. There would not be massive immigration to
America were it not for the availability of jobs. Current
immigrants, mostly from Mexico, are not coming here to escape
religious persecution, torture or mutilation, or dictatorship
governments. Is the demand for citizenship a means to full
participation in American society and government because this is
the nation they love, or merely a means to keeping a job and
acquiring voting rights?
(2) The question
is: who belongs in the household? Is God's good household roomy
enough for all? Or, who precisely is the "We" in
"We the People?" (From paragraph #3)
His question is easy
to answer: "We the People" refers to the citizens of the
United States of America--not the citizens of Mexico or Bolivia
or Norway. This brings us to Mahony's second theme: that the
household of God and the government of America are the same. Yes,
we are a nation under God, and some evangelicals believe America
is especially chosen or blessed by God, but that does not mean
that we are actually God's household or God's only household.
The concept of a household could apply to different nations,
communities, or family units. Even if we accept the idea that
America is God's household, or one of God's households, it does
not follow that the household would be administered in the way
that Mahony proposes. It is surprising that Mahony does not view
the Vatican as God's household.
(3) The Wisdom
of the Scriptures suggests that HOPE is a powerful push toward a
new future in which there is room enough for all in God's
household. The beginning of God's people on the earth involved
God moving Abraham across ancient borders:
Genesis 12:1 Now the LORD said to Abram, "Go from your
country and your kindred and your father's house to the land that
I will show you..." (From paragraph #4)
Mahony's third
theme is that of hope and the movement of people across borders
as both an action of hope and as a means to realize hope in
another land. It is an interesting theme, and I wish Mahony
would develop it in greater detail--perhaps as an academic paper
or book with examples from the Bible and world history. It may be
true that illegal immigrants come to America with hope for a
better future. However, that hope is linked to the availability of
jobs. Mahoney does not present his concept of hope as a pure
quality within itself, like honesty or loyalty. Nobody has to
cross a border to be an honest person. Is there no hope in
Mexico? Perhaps a different kind of hope? Perhaps hope based on
a people's political movement in their own country? Are the
Catholic priests in Mexico advocating for their own poor?
We now learn that
Mahony believes there is "room enough for all in God's
household." For Mahony, the "we" in "We the
People" seems to mean "all." And "all"
seems to mean everyone who has crossed the border illegally.
Taken literally, it is impossible for America to have room enough
for all the people in the world. Mahony's "all" seems
to refer to a population which is mostly Mexican and Roman
Catholic. Now, it is possible that a total of 100,000 Iraq War
refugees will soon be admitted to America. Will Cardinal Mahony
welcome these Muslims? If there were millions of Buddhist
illegal immigrants from Thailand living in America, would Mahony
advocate for them?
There are two major
flaws with Mahony's statements on crossing borders. (A) God
commanded Moses to leave his country and go to another land.
God did NOT command the citizens of Mexico or any other country
to go to America. (B) Crossing the U.S.-Mexico border northward
for the purpose of jobs and hope, is no different from the early
settlers of America moving ever westward for the same purpose.
If the northward expansion of Mexicans into America is a part of
God's oikonomia, then Mahony has validated the concept of
Manifest Destiny.
(4) So powerful
is this theme of new hope that in our history, the rich legacy of
African-American Gospel and Spirituals time and time again refers
to crossing the Jordan as the sign of hope; an escape from
despair. So, movement to places of hope is woven into the very
fabric of the Biblical story, continuing even today as we look
around us. (From paragraph #5)
Reference to
African-Americans, particularly to the history of black slaves in
America, is very out of place. The problem of illegal immigration
is NOT a civil rights issue. It is not a spiritual issue, unless
the illegal immigrants themselves view it as a personal spiritual
quest. Even if we view illegal immigration from Mahony's thematic
constructions, there is no connection between illegally and
voluntarily crossing the U.S. border with hope and having been
trafficked involuntarily in a slave ship across the Atlantic. The
Jordan River is a spiritual symbol in gospel music. It can be
applied to a mental or spiritual state, as well as to physical
movement from one place to another.
Some advocates seem
to try to compare giving sanctuary to illegal immigrants with the
history of slaves, Jews, and early Christians. What about
abolitionists who helped slaves escape? What about Christians
who hid Jews during World War II? What about the early Christians
who practiced their religion when it was illegal in the Roman
Empire? They all broke the law. Let me clarify these faulty
comparisons. Helping slaves and Jews was often a matter of life
and death. Slaves wanted liberation from a system that had
violated every aspect of their free will. Slavery involved the
ownership of humans based on skin color. Jews wanted to stay
alive and not be forcefully transported to death camps. Christians
who practiced their religion in the Roman Empire made a personal
choice and they often paid for it with martyrdom. Illegal
immigrants want jobs (and there is nothing wrong with wanting
jobs), they came to America voluntarily, and they are boldly
demanding citizenship in the world's greatest country.
There is also a
tendency to try to compare the illegal immigrant situation with
the Civil Rights movement and the Women's Suffrage movement. Let
me take a moment to also clarify these faulty comparisons. Those
blacks and women were American citizens. Their main focus was on
equality in their own country. Illegal immigrants, however, are
not American citizens, nor are they victims of discrimination in
terms of race, gender, age, or sexual orientation. As workers,
they are exploited. But, their children go to school with other
children, they use public transportation, they find housing, and
many live in sanctuary cities where they can work without fear of
deportation. Although illegal immigrants might have personal
experiences of discrimination, such discrimination is not built
into the law.
In another document
("A Day of Action in Honor of Immigrant Workers and Their
Families: Suggestions Toward Promoting Immigration Reform on May
1st, 2007"), Mahony calls for, among other changes,
"...labor protections which apply to U.S. workers; wages and
benefits which do not undercut domestic workers..." This
should be the main focus of advocacy for illegal immigrant
workers. Pay them fair and livable wages as you would pay an
American citizen. If all workers were paid the same wages for the
same jobs, then this would finally prove if illegal immigrants are
taking jobs away from American citizens. If Americans do not want
the jobs, then employers are justified in seeking an immigrant
workforce.
(5) Americans, of
course, understand this pull of hope and push of despair. We hear
it every time we contemplate the powerful words of Emma Lazarus,
now engraved on the base of the Statue of Liberty. Here are words
that continue to speak to a nation built by those whose despair,
enflamed by hope, drove them to cross borders and seek new
beginnings:
"Give me your tired, your poor, Your
huddled masses yearning to breath free..." (From paragraph
#7)
Many different
people have built and continue to build America. The Hispanic
community, like all waves of immigrants and their descendants, is
valued for their contributions. There are, however, complications
as America grows and as the world around us changes. I have
commented on these complications in other essays. Before illegal
immigration was ever a news item, I wrote Nation of Neighbors in January, 2004.
I also made some comments on illegal immigration and the poem of
Emma Lazarus in How Much Is One Life Worth? which I
wrote in August, 2006.
(6) It is
precisely because of their own origins in a people who moved in
hope to leave behind despair, that the Scriptures teach us to have
an unrelenting compassion for those who, even after 9/11 seek new
hope in their lives. The ethical injunctions of Moses remind us
again and again, in Deuteronomy, in Exodus, and in Leviticus.
(From paragraph #7)
Mahony then goes on
to quote the above Old Testament Books regarding care for the
stranger and the alien. Mahony seems to overlook the ways in
which Americans have already cared for illegal immigrants: free
education for their children, free school lunches, free hospital
services, and translation of many documents (including school
notices to parents,) into Spanish. As the Cardinal is aware,
there are Catholic masses conducted in Spanish. Courts provide
interpreters in order to afford them due process of law. America
also has immigration laws which welcome the stranger but these
laws are not followed and, to the benefit of the illegal
immigrant, usually are not enforced.
We all have hope
after 9/11. The most courageous are those who have hope after
the loss of loved ones in the Twin Towers, or after the loss of
soldiers in Iraq. We all hope for a safe and prosperous America,
and some have given their lives for this.
Not only do
Americans help the stranger after 9/11, but we also help the
foreigner in their own land. Below is a table from the Embassy of
the United States in Mexico. It shows the aid given to Mexico
from 2001 to 2004, and the requested amount for 2005 (the chart is
outdated, but it was all I could find on the Embassy website at
the time of this writing). The amounts are in millions of
dollars.
U.S. Aid to Mexico
Category |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005-Request |
Development Assitance |
7.885 |
8.116 |
13.224 |
17.895 |
14.777 |
Child Survival and Health Programs |
5.987 |
9.500 |
5.205 |
3.700 |
3.230 |
Economic Support |
6.178 |
10.000 |
11.685 |
11.342 |
13.392 |
Total |
20.050 |
27.616 |
30.114 |
33.027 |
31.399 |
In addition to the
above are the millions of dollars being spent on border security.
The American government is using taxpayer's money to build a
border fence to protect national sovereignty and to enforce
immigration laws, while Mahoney boldly defies this cost and effort
by justifying illegal immigration thus far. Regarding immigration
reform and a pathway to citizenship, it is taxpayers' money again
that will pay for the processing of new forms and the staffing of
a revamped department of government.
(7) Finally, the
head of the Jerusalem Church, the Apostle James, sternly warns us
never to take advantage of those who work among us as guests, or
their despair will reach the ear of God just as the cries of
Hebrew slaves under Egypt once did:
James 5:4 Listen! The
wages of the laborers who mowed your fields, which you kept back by
fraud, cry out, and the cries of the harvesters have reached the
ears of the Lord of hosts. (From paragraph #7)
The above passage
is the only one in which I find myself in complete agreement with
Mahony. American employers who pay lower wages to illegal
immigrants are guilty of taking advantage of them. Everyone has
probably heard or read stories of employers who withhold pay or
who cheat illegal immigrants out of promised pay. Not only do
these employers exploit illegal immigrants, but they also damage
the American job market with lowered wages which, in turn,
jeopardizes middle-class standards of living.
(8) As a
Christian, there are no prior commitments that can overrule, or
trump, this Biblical tradition of compassion for the stranger, the
alien, and the worker. In whatever economic, political, or social
policies we discuss - whatever discussion of
constitutional rights and liberties - we cannot turn our
backs to this Biblical legacy of hope. (From paragraph #7)
Let's talk about
other forms of compassion besides jobs, wages, harboring people
who have broken the law, and a pathway to citizenship. Many
people need compassion and concrete help: the homeless, drug
addicts, persons--usually women and children--who are trafficked
into prostitution, the victims of Hurricane Katrina who are still
trying to rebuild their lives, and Iraq War veterans who return
home disabled. The Catholic Church has many social programs, but
there are still unfulfilled needs to which Mahony could devote his
compassion and energy.
Here is a news item
from the Tennessee Democrat newspaper: "A woman testified
Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Tallahassee that Jorge Melchor
took her and another woman, who were both from Guatemala, to
trailer homes and an apartment to have sex for money with
Spanish-speaking men over the course of two days. Melchor is on
trial on charges of conspiracy, human trafficking and harboring
undocumented workers for the purpose of prostitution. On Monday,
Melchor, a native of Colombia, pleaded guilty to one count of
unlawful re-entry after being previously deported from the United
States." [End of quote.]
Citizenship will
not eliminate the market for prostitution or the trafficking of
women. What does the Church teach about prostitution? The two
women mentioned above have been physically violated and
emotionally traumatized. And, there are certainly many other
similar stories which we never hear about. Where do these women
fit in God's household?
(9) First, do
undocumented immigrants help our economy grow or do they use and
misue our economic resources? The premise of the question is
whether, in terms of pure monetary measurement, these individuals
and their families are a benefit to our country. I would submit,
based on this narrow premise, that these immigrants fill
important jobs and contribute overall to our national economy.
(From paragraph #11)
It is very difficult
to find reliable information on whether or not illegal immigrants
contribute to or take from the American economy. This matter is
not a "narrow premise" but an essential one. The
prosperity of America is essential to our citizens, especially to
our middle class which is what enables us to maintain a democracy,
and to our position of positive influence in the world. For more
information on the topic of illegal immigrants and the economy of
New York City, see my essay on Response to Michael Bloomberg which I
wrote in March, 2006.
(10) In Catholic
thought, the human person should not serve the economy, but the
economy should serve the human person, so that each person
and his or her family can live in dignity and without want and
can move, if needed, to find the place of hope. (From
paragraph #12)
This is perhaps the
most vague passage in Mahony's speech. On the surface, it sounds
like socialism. Since Mahony frames this passage in terms of
"Catholic thought," let's talk more about families and
human dignity. The Social Agenda, published by the
Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, states: "Migrants
should be met with a hospitable and welcoming attitude which can
encourage them to become part of the Church's life, always with
due regard for their freedom and their specific cultural
identity." And in the same paragraph: "The Church in
America must be constantly concerned to provide for the effective
evangelization of those recent arrivals who do not yet know
Christ."
For the sake of
brevity in an essay which is already quite long, I will relate
Mahony's remarks and the The Social Agenda quotations to
three specific problems within the Hispanic community: domestic
violence, illegitimate births, and drunken driving. One out of
every four women in America will be victimized by domestic
violence, and the chances are higher for immigrant women. The
American government attempted to help these women with the
Violence Against Women Act which was passed in 1994. This Act
states that illegal immigrants who are victims of domestic
violence, married to American citizens or to permanent residents,
can themselves apply for residency rather than their husbands
having to apply for them. This is just another one of the ways in
which America helps the stranger.
Next, let's look at
some of the statistics on illegitimate births. One out of every 7
Hispanic immigrant women had an illegitimate baby, and 65 percent
of these illegitimate births were to mothers who did not graduate
from high school. (These percentages are from 2003.) Illegitimacy
is not necessarily a problem of illegal immigration, but a cultural
problem in the countries from which the illegal immigrants come.
For example, the illegitimacy rate in El Salvador is 73 percent; in
Jamaica it is 86 percent.
The chart below
shows the increases in illegitimate births among immigrants and
native-born Americans from 1980 to 2003. The data comes from the
National Center for Health Services, and was analyzed by the
Center for Immigration Studies. (Puerto Rican-born mothers were
excluded from the chart. All children were American-born.)
Number and Percent of Illegitimate Births
for Immigrants and Native-Born by Race and Hispanic
Origin
|
2003 |
2003 |
1980 |
1980 |
|
Percent Illegitimate |
Number Illegitimate |
Percent Illegitimate |
Number Illegitimate |
IMMIGRANTS |
31.5% |
298,332 |
13.3% |
44,764 |
Hispanic |
41.9% |
234,317 |
18.8% |
27,243 |
Non-Hispanic White |
11.8% |
16,054 |
6.3% |
6,593 |
Non-Hispanic Black |
39.4% |
27,815 |
32.6% |
7,447 |
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific |
11.0% |
19,804 |
4.2% |
2,433 |
NATIVE-BORN |
35.4% |
1,105,404 |
18.8% |
607,393 |
Hispanic |
49.6% |
165,502 |
25.9% |
36,174 |
Non-Hispanic White |
24.4% |
537,423 |
9.9% |
248,111 |
Non-Hispanic Black |
72.5% |
368,285 |
57.5% |
307,390 |
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific |
29.9% |
10,146 |
17.7% |
2,308 |
TOTAL |
34.5% |
1,403,736 |
18.3% |
652,157 |
The study goes on
to say: "Research shows that children of unmarried parents
are much more likely to live in poverty, have low academic
achievement, and have higher high school dropout rates than those
born to married parents. Run-ins with the law, drug use, and
incarceration are all more common among children born to unmarried
parents. Welfare use is also significantly higher for families
with illegitimate children. Infants born out of wedlock suffer
higher mortality rates. Illegitimate children have been found to
suffer from more-difficult-to-measure problems such as low levels
of self esteem and self worth. Finally, children of unmarried
parents are themselves at higher risk for being unmarried parents
when they reach adulthood. One of the most important and troubling
findings by researchers is that being born out of wedlock
increases the chances of negative social outcomes for children
even after controlling for income, race, and other social factors.
Illegitimacy is clearly a problem for both those born to unmarried
parents and for the larger society." [End of quote.]
When Mahony speaks
of oikonomia, or the management of God's household, he must
also consider the social problems which illegal immigrants bring
with them and the adjustment difficulties which may or may not
exacerbate these problems. Citizenship is not a remedy for
problems which were already a part of the illegal immigrant's
culture. Again, I recognize that the Roman Catholic Church has
many social and mental health programs, but there is a huge
problem with illegitimate births which has gotten worse over the
years. This goes against Catholic teachings on pre-marital sex
and against Catholic family values.
Finally, let's look
at the problem of drinking and driving. The Orange County chapter
of MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) provides the following
statistics. The statistics are based on 178,950 DUI arrests (not
convictions) during 2001.
California DUI
Arrests, 2001
Male |
84.8% |
Hispanic |
44.1% (31.3% of the population) |
White |
42.6% (49.7% of the population) |
Black |
7% (6.7% of the population) |
Other |
6.3% (12.4% of the population) |
(11) The current
reality in our nation, however, is that we accept their labor,
their separation from family, their taxes, and their purchasing
power, yet we do not offer the undocumented population the
protection of our laws. While such a system might meet our
economic needs in the narrow measurement of monetary gain, it
fails to meet the broad definition of oikonomia or the call
of Scripture. It contributes to a disordered household without
hope and without compassion, as we witness in immigrant
neighborhoods throughout the nation. (From paragraph #13)
It is not
necessarily laws or lack of laws which caused the current
dysfunctional immigration system. Current laws are not enforced.
Big business and the government have permitted the employment of
illegal immigrants. Corporations are not penalized. Illegal
immigrants are not deported. After years of massive illegal
immigration, we now feel the burden placed on schools, hospitals,
prisons, and neighborhoods. It is out of control.
Mahony seems to
refer to immigrant neighborhoods as disordered households,
without hope; or to the lack of proper oikonomia as
creating disorder in these neighborhoods. In an article entitled,
"The Realignment of America," Michael Barone (author of
Our First Revolution: The Remarkable British Upheaval That
Inspired America's Founding Fathers) talks about the current
trend of mainstream Americans moving out of large costal cities,
such as Los Angeles where Mahony serves as Archbishop, while
immigrants are moving into these areas. He states:"The
result is that these Coastal Megalopolises are increasingly a
two-tiered society, with large affluent populations happily
contemplating (at least until recently) their rapidly rising
housing values, and a large, mostly immigrant working class
working at low wages and struggling to move up the economic
ladder. The economic divide in New York and Los Angeles is
starting to look like the economic divide in Mexico City and
São Paulo." [End of quote.]
These changes in
demographics will also mean changes in electoral votes and
Congressional seats. It means opportunity for new leaders to
emerge. Mahony, although not a newcomer, seems to be emerging in
a new role as a leader of and spokesperson for illegal immigrants.
If large numbers of immigrants remain in certain cities (the
U.S. Census has measured this trend), then immigrants might not
have motivation to assimilate into American society. If they are
socially and pyschologically isolated in ethnic neighborhoods,
they might not really be aware of the characteristics and values
of mainstream society. The lack of true oiknonomia,
therefore, is obstructed by their lack of familiarity with
everyday Americans, and by some leaders who politically
manipulate them with extremist views of multiculturalism.
Citizenship will not improve this. It will probably take several
generations for the illegal immigrant population to adjust to
American life.
(12) Once it is
agreed that all should share in the feast that is the fruit of
their hands, the question becomes whether those who reside outside
the law have the same claim to a seat at the table as those who
are not outside of it. Given the current broken immigration
system, Church leaders say "Yes!" Let me explain.
(From paragraph #15)
No citizen of a
foreign country should have the same claim as an American citizen.
Citizenship is not a form of welfare. Citizenship involves a
preference for America above one's country of origin, and
assimilation and allegiance. It means physical and psychological
separation from the country of origin, not just in terms of hope
in a new land, but in terms of formation of a new identity. This
does not seem to be true among Mexicans who still believe that the
Southwest belongs to Mexico and who carry resentment toward
America for having won the Mexican-American War.
(13) In the view
of Church leadership, and many others, our current immigration
laws are, in a word, unjust. We gladly accept the toil
and taxes of the immigrant work force to fill our economic needs,
but we look the other way when they are exploited in the
workplace, die in the desert, or are arrested for providing
"nanny" and cleaning services at desirable addresses.
When convenient politically, we scapegoat the immigrant without
acknowledging our complicity. Our immigration laws perpetuate
this reality. (From paragraph #18)
America's
immigration laws are not unjust. The current immigration system
is broken because the laws have not been enforced, and now it is
too late to enforce them without human suffering. This broken
system has actually emboldened illegal immigrants to demand
amnesty and citizenship. They have protested in the streets
without fear of arrest. The cities where immigration protest
marches took place even brought out portable toilets for them!
Let's face it, no illegal immigrants appear to be returning to
their native countries. The harsh reality is that their lives in
America, even with employer exploitation, is better than their
lives were in their native countries.
Dying in the desert?
Yes, that happens. Often, they are abandoned by the human
smugglers (people of their own race) who guide them across the
border. American border agents in Arizona put water barrels out
in the desert for them, with bright blue flags to indicate free
water. Acknowledge our complicity? The average American citizen
never knew what was going on. American taxpayers were duped by
big business and our own government. "We the People"
were not involved in breaking the immigration system, but are we
are the ones trying to fix it. Our immigration laws may be
outdated or inadequate, but not unjust or immoral.
(14) In the area
of immigration, the Church leadership argues that our country has
a moral obligation to change the law because it violates
the order of God's household and undermines basic human
dignity. (From paragraph #20)
Let's talk about
Church leadership and God's household. Hispanics are changing the
Roman Catholic Church in America. Currently, Hispanics account
for around one-third of America's Catholics. However, 54 percent
of them practice a charismatic form of Catholicism unknown to
previous generations of Irish American Catholics or Italian
American Catholics. This is true of immigrant as well as
American-born Hispanics. This situation is further complicated by
the fact that many Hispanic Catholics are converting to
Protestant religions, especially to pentecostalism. The following
chart is taken from the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. It
shows the religious affiliation of Hispanics in America, in
2007.
Religious Affiliation of Hispanics in America
Roman Catholic |
68% |
Protestant |
20% |
Secular |
8% |
Other Christians |
3% |
Other Faiths |
1% |
Don't Know/Refused |
1% |
Hispanic
evangelicals are more likely to vote Republican, whereas Hispanic
Catholics are more likely to vote Democrat. The influence of
Hispanic evangelicals is also being felt in other countries
which have been strongholds of Catholicism. Pope Benedict XVI
recently visited Brazil where the Catholic population has
decreased from 89 percent in 1980 to 74 percent in 2000.
Brazilian Catholics are also practicing a charismatic form of
Catholicism which includes divine healing and speaking in tongues.
The conversion of Hispanic Catholics to spirit-filled forms of
worship, and the inclusion of animated charismatic worship within
the Catholic mass, is a disturbing social change for Catholic
leaders.
(15) From the
Catholic perspective, the ultimate question in the immigration
debate is whether we want to live in a society that accepts the
toil of undocumented workers with one hand and then treats them
like criminals with the other. (From paragraph #21)
Mahony needs to
provide examples of how illegal immigrants are treated like
criminals.
(16) It respects
the place of national sovreignty - based on moral
principles and freedom - not a fiction of artificial
national security. It also is grounded in a proper view of
economics, true to the etymology of the term which emerged in
ancient civilizations and in early Christian history to describe
the arrangement of a household - God's household which
is ordered and open to those who long to sit at the table which
they helped set. (From paragraph #25)
Six suspected
terrorists, now known as the Fort Dix Six, were recently arrested
for planning to attack the Fort Dix military base in New Jersey.
Three of them had entered America illegally in 1984, crossing the
U.S.-Mexico border into Texas. Due to government inefficiency and
the don't-ask-don't-tell policy, they were never deported.
The need for homeland security is real. It is a matter of life
and death. We must be constantly vigilant.
(17) We continue
on a lifelong journey that is guided not only by the legacy of the
Christian tradition, but by the deepest yearnings of every heart -
the heart of every person of every nation - the soul of each
human being regardless of religious persuasion. Because
fundamentally the deepest desire, the highest aspiration, and the
most enduring hope of each and every person, is to breathe
free. (From paragraph #27)
This is the last
and perhaps most romantic paragraph of Mahony's speech. Mahony
seems to be searching for a commonality between illegal immigrants
and all human beings. In other words, we all yearn to be free.
Or, in other words, we are all illegal immigrants at heart.
Mahony's final theme seems to be in the vein of the 'brotherhood
of man.' This theme harks back to the 1960's, back to another
era of political activism. It is almost nostalgic.
Does everybody
yearn to be free? History seems to prove otherwise, and so would
a glance at any of today's newspapers. What about Jorge Melchor,
the man mentioned earlier who forced two women into prostitution?
There are many examples of antisocial and criminal behavior which
seem to point to a deep desire to squash the freedom of others.
If there is such a thing as evil, then Mahony's final argument
is invalidated. And, again, illegal immigrants currently come to
America for jobs and not because they yearn for freedom from
persecution or dictatorships. They yearn for a higher standard
of living and the good things that money can buy.
Conclusion to
Part II
The social problems
of the illegal immigrant population are extensive, and some of
these problems pre-date their entry into America. Many illegal
immigrants, and their American-born children, seem to continue
and even increase the culturally based problems of their native
countries. Illegal immigration itself is a social problem for
many mainstream Americans because of language barriers, and
because of the impact on schools, hospitals, courts and prisons.
These problems must be addressed, but we must do so according to
an objective fact-finding process.
In order to provide
mental health services to immigrants, legal or illegal, it will
certainly be necessary to hire bilingual social workers and
psychologists. This means that many qualified mainstream American
professionals will not be eligible for these jobs, and that there
will likely be a shortage of trained or college-educated bilingual
people. This shortage could be temporary, depending on how many
Hispanic and other ethnic groups are attracted to the helping
professions. "Bilingual prefered" is already a reality
in the classified ads and for different types of jobs.
Perhaps the real
commonality among Americans is the yearning for self-determination.
There is concern that illegal immigration is going to have a
long-term negative impact on middle-class standards of living and
on opportunities for upward mobility. This does not imply racism.
False accusations of racism, just because others happen to
disagree, have a temper-tantrum quality. Likewise, pandering for
votes or church members completely disregards the humanity of the
illegal immigrant. It exploits their lack of education, and
violates the trust and needs of "We the People."
(Written 06/04/07: bibliography available.)
Until we meet
again..............stay sane.
|